International Association of Geodesy's 
Special Study Group 3.177

SYNTHETIC MODELLING OF THE EARTH'S GRAVITY FIELD
Home Aims Membership Views Circular letters Reports Models Software Bibliography

Bibliography


[ A ] [ B ] [ C ] [ D ] [ E ] [ F ] [ G ] [ H ] [ I ] [ J ] [ K ] [ L ] [ M ] [ N ] [ O ] [ P ] [ Q ] [ R ] [ S ] [ T ] [ U ] [ V ] [ W ] [ X ] [ Y ] [ Z ]

 
 

A A A

  • Aleksidze MA (1966) Ob odnom predstavlenii anomalnogo gravitacionnogo polja. Dokl. akad. nauk. SSSR, Tom 170, No. 4.
  • Allasia G (2001) Approximating potential integrals by cardinal basis interpolation on multivariate scattered data, Computers and Mathematics with Applications (in press).
  • Ananda MP (1977) Lunar Gravity: A Mass Point Model, J. Geophy. Res., Washington 82 20, 3049-3064.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

B B B

  • Ballani L, Engelis J, Grafarend, EW (1993) Global base functions for the mass density in the interior of a massive body (Earth), manuscripta geodaetica, 18: 99-114.
  • Balmino G (1972) Representation of the Earth Potential by Buried Masses, Geophys. Monogr. Ser. Vol. 15, The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, Edited by S.W. Henriksen, A. Mancini and B.H. Chovitz, American Geophysical Union, Washington.
  • Balmino G (1974) La representation du potentiel terrestre par masses ponctuelles, Bulletin Géodésique, Paris, Nr. 111, 85-108.
  • Balmino G, Barriot J, Koop R, Middel B, Thong N, Vermeer M (1991) Simulation of gravity gradients: a comparison study, Bulletin Geodesique, 65: 218-229.
  • Barthelmes F (1980) Representation of the Geopotential by Buried Point Masses Using an Algorithm to Find the Magnitudes and Plausible Positions of the Masses, Nabljudenija iskusstvennych sputnikov zemli, Sofia 20, 491-501.
  • Barthelmes F (1981) Eine Methode zur Darstellung des Schwerefeldes mit Hilfe von Punktmassen, Vermessungstechnik, Berlin 29 6, 185-188.
  • Barthelmes F (1982) Optimalnaja approksimacija geopotenciala s pomoscju minimalnogo cisla tocecnych mass. Vortrag, gehalten auf der Internationalen Wissenschaftlichen Konferenz der Sektion 6 INTERKOSMOS, Suzdal.
  • Barthelmes F (1986) Untersuchungen zur Approximation des äußeren Schwerefeldes der Erde durch Punktmassen mit optimierten Positionen. Potsdam: Veröffentlichungen des Zentralinstitut Physik der Erde Nr. 92, Potsdam, Germnay.
  • Barthelmes F (1989) Local gravity field approximation by point masses with optimized positions. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium "Geodesy and Physics of the Earth", GDR, Potsdam, August 22 -27, Veröffentlichungen des Zentralinstitut Physik der Erde Nr. 102, Part 2.
  • Barthelmes F, Kautzleben H (1983) A new method of modelling the gravity field of the earth by point masses. Paper presented to the General Assembly of the IAG, Symposium C, Hamburg.
  • Barthelmes F, Dietrich R (1991) Use of point masses on optimized positions for the approximation of the gravity field, Determination of the Geoid, Present and Future, IAG Symposia 106, 484-493.
  • Barthelmes F, Dietrich R, Lehmann R (1991) Use of point masses on optimised positions for the approximation of the gravity field, in: Rapp RH, Sanso F (eds) Determination of the Geoid, Springer, Berlin, 484-493.
  • Biroli M (1997) Free boundary problems, in: Geodetic Boundary Value Problems in View of the One Centimeter(si) Geoid, Sanso F, Rummel R (eds), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany: 98-118.
  • Blakely RJ (1995) Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press, England, 441 pp.
  • Bolt BA (1957) Earth models with continuous density distribution, MNRAS Geophys. Suppl. 7, 372-
  • Bott MHP, Smith RA (1958) The estimation of the limiting depth of gravitating bodies, Geophys. Prosp. 6, 1-.
  • Bullard EC (1957) The density within the Earth, Vehr Nederl Geol Mijn Genoot, Geol S 18, 23-
  • Bullard EC, Cooper RIB (1948) The determination of mass necessary to produce a given gravitational field, Proc Royal Soc A194, 332-.
  • Bullen KE (1936) The variation of density and the ellipticities of strata of equal density within the Earth. MNRAS Geophys. Suppl. 3, 395-.
  • Bullen KE (1940) The problem of the Earth's density variation. Bull Seism Soc Am 30, 235-.
  • Bullen KE (1975) The Earth?s Density, Chapman-Hall, London.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

C C C

  • Chambat F, Valette B (2001): Mean radius, mass and inertia for reference Earth models. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 124(3-4): 237-253.
  • Claessens S, Featherstone WE, Barthelmes F (2001) Experiments with free-positioned point-mass geoid modelling in the Perth region of Western Australia, Geomatics Research Australasia, (submitted in 2000)
  • Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 425pp.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

D D D

  • Dampney CNG (1969) The equivalent source technique, Geophysics, 34: 39-53.
  • Denker H, Torge W, Wenzel G, Ihde J, Schirmer U (2000) Investigation of different methods for the combination of gravity and GPS/levelling data, Geodesy beyond 2000, the Challenges of the first Decade, IAG Symposia 121, 137-142.
  • Dentith MC, Bruner I, Long A, Middleton MF, Scott JZ (1993) Structure of the eastern margin of the Perth Basin, Western Australia. Exploration Geophysics, 24(3), 455-462.
  • Dietrich R, Gendt G (1988) A gravity field model from Lageos based on point masses (POEM -L1). Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium "Geodesy and Physics of the Earth", GDR, Potsdam, August 22 -27.
  • Dietrich R, Gendt G, Barthelmes F. (1989) Geodynamic Research using Lageos Laser Ranging Data at the Central Institute for Physics of the Earth Potsdam (GDR). Paper presented at the IAG General Meeting Edinburgh, Scotland, August 3-12.
  • Dziewonski AM, Anderson DL (1981) Preliminary reference Earth model. Physics of the Earth Planetary Interiors, 25: 297-356.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

E E E

  • Egyed L (1957) A new method of average density determination. Ann Univ Sc Budapeste S Geol I, 33-
  • Engels J (1991) Eine approximative Loesung der fixen geodaetischen Randwert-aufgabe im Innen- und Aussenraum der Erde. Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission Reihe C Nr. 379, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Germany.
  • Engels J, Grafarend E, Keller W, Martinec Z, Sanso F, Vanicek P (1993) The geoid as an inverse problem to be regularised. in: Inverse Problems: Principles and Applications to Geophysics, Technology and Medicine, Anger et al., (eds), Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 122-167.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

F F F

  • Featherstone WE (1998) Do we need a Gravimetric Geoid or a Model of the Australian Height Datum to Transform GPS Heights in Australia?, The Australian Surveyor, 43(4), 273-280.
  • Featherstone WE (1999) Tests of two forms of Stokes's integral using a synthetic gravity field based on spherical harmonics, in: Festschrift Erik Grafarend, University of Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Featherstone WE (2000) Refinement of a gravimetric geoid using GPS and levelling data. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 126(2), 27-56.
  • Featherstone WE (2000) Towards the unification of the Australian Height Datum between the mainland and Tasmania using GPS and AUSGeoid98. Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology.
  • Featherstone WE, Olliver JG (1997) A method to validate gravimetric geoid computation software based on Stokes's integral, Journal of Geodesy, 72(3): 154-160.
  • Featherstone WE, Stewart MP (1998) Possible evidence for distortions in the Australian Height Datum in Western Australia, Geomatics Research Australasia, 68: 1-12.
  • Featherstone WE, Guo W (2000) Evaluations of the precision of AUSGeoid98 versus AUSGeoid93 using Global Positioning System and Australian Height Datum data. Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology.
  • Featherstone WE, Kirby JF, Kearsley AHW, Gilliland JR, Johnston GM, Steed J, Forsberg R, Sideris MG (2000) The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data. Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology.
  • Feistritzer M (1998) Geoidbestimmung mit geopotentiellen Koten. Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission Reihe C Nr. 486, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Germany.
  • Forsberg R (1984) Local covariance functions and density distributions. Dept. geod. Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Rep. 356.
  • Forsberg R (1984) A Study of Terrain Reductions, Density Anomalies and Geophysical Inversion Methods in Gravity Field Modelling. Dept. of Geod. Sci., Rep. 355, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
  • Freeden W (1983) Least squares approximation by linear combinations of (multi) poles. Dept. geod. Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Rep. 344.
  • Freeden W, Glockner O, Schreiner M (1998) Spherical panel clustering and its numerical aspects, Journal of Geodesy, 72(10): 586-599.
  • Furness P (2000) Computing three-dimensional gravitational fields with equivalent sources. Geophysical Prospecting, Volume 48, Number 3, 603-615.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

G G G

  • Grafarend E (1994) What is a geoid? In: Geoid and its Geophysical Interpretations, Vanicek P, Christou N (eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton, 3-32.
  • Grafarend E, Engels J (1993) The gravitational field of topographic-isostatic masses and the hypothesis of mass condensation, Surveys in Geophysics, 14: 495-524.
  • Grafarend E, Engels J, Sorcik P (1995) The gravitational field of topographic-isostatic masses and the hypothesis of mass condensation - part I and II. Technical Report 1995.1 Schriftenreihe der Institut des Fachbereichs Vermessungswesen, Department of Geodesy, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Grafarend E, Engels J, Sorcik P (1996) The gravitational field of topographic-isostatic masses and the hypothesis of mass condensation II - the topographic-isostatic geoid, Surveys in Geophysics, 17: 41-66.
  • Grafarend E, Engels J, Varga P (1997) The spacetime gravitational field of a deformable body, Journal of Geodesy, 72(1): 11-30.
  • Grafarend EW, Keller W (1995) Setup of observational functionals in gravity space as well as in geometry space, manuscripta geodaetica, 20: 301-325
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

H H H

  • Haagmans R (2000) A synthetic Earth model for use in geodesy, Journal of Geodesy
  • Hardy RL (1978) The application of multiquadratic equations and point mass anomoly models to crustal movement studies. NOAA Techn. Rep. NOS 76 NGS 11, Rockville, USA.
  • Hauck H, Lelgemann D (1985) Regional gravity field approximation with buried point masses using least - norm collocation. Manuscripta Geodetica 10: 50-58.
  • Heikinnen M (1981) Solving the shape of the Earth by using digital density models, Report 81:2, Finnish Geodetic Institute, Masala, Finland.
  • Heiskanen WA Moritz H (1967) Physical Geodesy. Graz: Reprint Institute of Physical Geodesy, Technical University, Graz, Austria, pp364. 
  • Hobson EW (1931) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics, Cambridge University Press
  • Holloway RD (1988) The integration of GPS heights into the Australian Height Datum. School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, Uniserv S~33.
  • Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2001) A generalised approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very-high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions, Journal of Geodesy (submitted in 1999).
  • Holota P (1995) Two branches of the Newton potential and geoid, In: Suenkel H, Marson I (eds) Gravity and Geoid, Springer, Berlin, 92-101.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

I I I

  • Ihde J (1995) Geoid determination by GPS and levelling. In: International Association of Geodesy. Symposia 113, Gravity and Geoid. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 
  • Ihde J, Schirmer U, Stefani F, Toeppe F (1998) Geoid modelling with point masses, Proc Second Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Budapest, 199-204.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

J J J

  • Jordan SK (1978) Statistical model for gravity, topography, and density contrasts in the Earth, Journal of Geophysical Research, 83(B4): 1816-1824.
  • Junkins JL Engels RC (1979) The Finite-Element approach in gravity modelling. Manuscripta Geodetica, 4:2,

    • 185-206.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

K K K

  • Kakkuri J, Wang Z (1998) Structural effects of the crust on the geoid modelled using deep seismic sounding interpretation. Geophysical Journal International 135: 495-504.
  • Kapradze VD, Aleksidze MA (1964) Metod funkcionalnych uravnenija dlja priblizennogo resenija nekotorych

    • granicnych zadac. Zurn. vycislit. matem. i matem. fiz., Moskva 4:4. 
  • Katsambolos, KE (1981) Simulation studies on the computation of the gravity vector in space from surface data considering the topography of the Earth, Report 314, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Kaula W (1959) Statistical and harmonic analysis of gravity. J Geophys Res 64, 2401-
  • Kautzleben H, Barthelmes F (1983) Point mass representation of the Earth gravity field. Proceedings of the International

    • Symposium "Figure of the Earth, the Moon and other Planets", Published by the Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography Prague.
  • Kearsley AHW, Sideris MG, Krynski J,  Forsberg R, Schwarz KP (1985) White Sands revisited - A comparison of techniques to predict deflections of the vertical. Division of Surveying Engineering, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Publ. 30007.
  • Keller W (1998) On a scalar fixed gravimetry-altimetry boundary value problem, Journal of Geodesy, 70(8): 459-469.
  • Keller W, Grafarend E (1995) Setup of observational functionals in gravity space as well as in geometry space, manuscripta geodaetica, 20: 301-325.
  • Kellog OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory, Springer, Berlin.
  • Klees R (1995) Report SC2-project: comparison of several techniques for solving geodetic boundary value problems by means of numerical experiments in Willis p (ed) Travaux de l?association internationale de geodesie, paris.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

L L L

  • Lambeck K (1988) Geophysical Geodesy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 718p
  • Lambert WD (1961) The gravity field of an ellipsoid of revolution as a level surface, OSU Rep 14, Ohio State Univ. Columbus, USA.
  • Lehmann R (1993) The method of free-positioned point masses - geoid studies on the Gulf of Bothnia, Bulletin Geodesique, 67: 31-40.
  • Lehmann R (1994) Nonlinear gravity field inversion using point masses - diagnosing non-linearity, in: Montag H, Reigber C (eds) Geodesy and Physics of the Earth, Springer, Berlin, 256-260.
  • Lehmann R (1996) Information measures for global geopotential models, Journal of Geodesy, 70: 342-348.
  • Lehmann R (1999) Numerical aspects of altimetry-gravimetry problems. Proc. IV Hotine-Marussi Symp. on Math. Geodesy Trento (Italy), Sept. 14-17, 1998. (in press)
  • Lehmann R (1999) Studies on the altimetry-gravimetry problems for geoid determination. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy, 24, 47-52.
  • Lehmann, R. (2000) Technical description of the axisymmetric experiment for the study of the altimetry-gravimetry problems of geodesy.
  • Lehmann R, Barthelmes F (1992) Detection and estimation of model errors in geoid computations by gravimetric inversion.

    • Presented at the Workshop on Mathemetical-geodetic methods for the determination of geoid and topography, Lambrecht, 4-8 May 1992.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

M M M

  • Marcenko A (1982) O nekotorych teoreticeskich aspektach predstavlenija geopotenciala potencialom sistemy tocecnych

    • mass. Izv. vuzov Geodezija i aerofotosemka, Moskva, Nr. 3.
  • Martinec Z (1993) A model of compensation of topographic masses, Surveys in Geophysics, 14: 525-535.
  • Martinec Z (1994) The density contrast at the Mohorovicic discontinuity, Geophysical Journal International, 117: 539-544.
  • Martinec Z (1994) The minimum depth of compensation of topographic masses, Geophysical Journal International, 117: 545-554.
  • Martinec Z, Pec K (1987) Three-dimensional density distribution generating the observed gravity field of planets - Part 1, The Earth, Proc Figure of the Earth Moon and other planets, Research Institute of Geodesy, Prague.
  • Marussi A (1980) On the density distribution in bodies of assigned outer Newtonian attraction, Bolletino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, XXII(86): 83-94.
  • Mescerjakov GA, Marcenko AN, Tatevian SK, Sorokin NA (1981) On the use of point mass models of the geopotential for orbit predictions. Adv. Space Res. COSPAR 1:6, Pergamon Press, 1-6.
  • Meng J, Cai X (1992) Walsh-Fourier series expansion of the Earth?s gravitational potential, in: Columbo O (ed) From Mars to Greenland: Charting gravity with Space and Airborne Instruments, Springer, Berlin, 339-348.
  • Mitchell HL (1990) GPS Heighting and the AHD.
  • Mooney WD, Laske G, Masters G (1998) CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5°x5°, Journal of Geophysical Research, 103: 727-747.
  • Moritz H (1968) Density distributions for the equipotential ellipsoid, Report 115, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Moritz H (1968) Mass distributions for the equipotential ellipsoid, Bolletino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 10: 59-65.
  • Moritz H (1989) A set of continuous density distributions within a sphere compatible with a given external gravitational potential, Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik, 98: 185-192.
  • Moritz H (1990) The Figure of the Earth: Theoretical Geodesy of The Earth?s Interior, Wichman, Karlsruhe, pp. 279.
  • Muller P, Sjogren WL (1968) Mascons: Lunar mass concentrations. Science, Cambridge (Mass.) 161 680.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

N N N

  • Nagy D, Papp G, Bemedek J (2000): The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. Journal of Geodesy, 70: 552-560.
  • Needham PE (1970) The formation and evaluation of detailed geopotential models based on point masses. Dept. geod. Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Rep. 149.
  • Nettleton LL (1939) Determination of density for the reduction of gravimetric observations. Geophysics 4, 176-.
  • Novak P, Vanicek P, Veronneau M, Holmes S, Featherstone WE (2001) On the accuracy of modified Stokes?s integration in high-frequency gravimetric geoid determination, Journal of Geodesy, 74(11): 644-654.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

O O O

  • Okubo S (1991) Potential and gravity changes raised by point dislocations, Geophysical Journal International, 105: 573-586.
  • Oldham CH, Sutherland DB (1955) Othogonal polynomials - their use in estimating the regional effect. Geophysics 20, 295.
  • Ostac OM, Agajeva IN (1982) Approksimacija vnesnego gravitacionnogo polja Zemli modelju gravitirujuscich

    • tocecnych mass. W: Izucenie Zemli kak planety metodami astronomii, geodezii u geofiziki, Trudy 1 Orlovskoj konferencii,
    Kiev naukova dumka.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

P P P

  • Pail R. (1999): Synthetic Global Gravity Model for Planetary Bodies and Applications in Satellite Gravity Gradiometry, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Graz, Austria.
  • Papp G (1996) Gravity field approximation based on volume element model of the density distribution. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 31: 339-358.
  • Papp G (1996) On the application of physical filtering in 3-D forward gravity modelling. Meurers, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7 th International Meeting on Alpine Gravimetry. In: Österreichische Beiträge zu Meteorologie und Geophysik, Heft 14: 145-154.
  • Papp G, Kalmar, J (1996) Toward the physical interpretation of the geoid in the Pannonian Basin using 3-D model of the lithosphere. IGeS Bulletin 5: 63-87.
  • Papp G, Wang, ZT (1996) Truncation effects in using spherical harmonic expansions for forward local gravity field modelling. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica., 31(1-2): 47-66.
  • Petrovskaya MS (1976) A new form of representing the geopotential, Bulletin Geodesique, 50: 353-362.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

Q Q Q
 
 

R R R

  • Rapp RH, Pavlis NK, Wang YM (1991) High resolution gravity models combining terrestrial and satellite data. Presented at the XX General Assembly of the IUGG, Vienna, 11-24 August 1991.
  • Reilly JP, Herbrechtsmeier EH (1978) A systematic approach to modelling the geopotential with point mass anomalies. J. geoph. Res., Washington 83:B2, 841-844.
  • Robertson DS (1996) Treating absolute gravity data as a space-craft tracking problem. Metrologia, 33: 545-548
  • Roelse A, Granger HW, Graham JW (1971) The adjustment of the Australian levelling survey - 1970-71. Technical Report 12, Division of National Mapping, Canberra, Australia.
  • Rummel, R, Rapp RH, Suenkel H, Tscherning CC (1988) Comparisons of global topographic isostatic models to the Earth?s observed gravity field, Report 388, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

S S S

  • Sambridge M, Braun J, McQueen H (1995) Geophysical parametrization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbours, Geophysical Journal International, 122: 837-857.
  • Sanso F, Barzaghi R, Tscherning CC (1986) Choice of norm for the density distribution of the Earth, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 87:123-141.
  • Sanso F, Rummel R (eds) (1997) Geodetic Boundary Value Problems in View of the One Centimeter Geoid, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Scales LE (1985) Introduction to non-linear optimization. Mac Millan Publishers Ltd, London and Basingstoke.
  • Schwarz KP (ed.) (1983) Techniques to predict gravity anomalies and deflections of the vertical in mountainous areas (a

    • joint report of members of the IAG SSG 4.70). Division of Surveying Engineering, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Publ. 30004.
  • Stacey FD (1993) Physics of the Earth (third edition), Brookfiled Press, Queensland, Australia.
  • Strakov VN Schaefer U, Strakhov AV, Luchitsky AI, Teterin DE (1995) A new approach to approximate the Earth?s gravity field, in Seunkel H, Marson I (eds) Gravity and Geoid, Springer, Berlin, 225-237.
  • Strohmeyer D, Ballani L (1984) Uniqueness of the inverse gravimetric problem for point mass models. Manuscripta Geodetica, Sindelfingen 9: 125-136.
  • Strykowski G (1995) Geoedetic and geophysical inverse problem, the most adequate solution and the information content. In: Suenkel and Marson (eds) Gravity and Geoid, Springer, Berlin, 215-224.
  • Strykowski G (1996) Borehole data and stochastic gravimetric inversion. PhD-thesis, University of Copenhagen. Publ. 4 series, vol. 3, National Survey and Cadastre - Denmark, ISBN 87-7866-013-0.
  • Strykowski G (1997) Experiences with a detailed estimation of the mass density contrasts and of the regional gravity field using geometrical information from seismograms, Proc. XXII General Assembly of the European Geophysical Society, Vienna.
  • Strykowski G (1997) Formulation of the mathematical frame of the joint inverse gravimetric-seismic modelling problem based on the analysis of regionally distributed borehole data, In: Segawa, Fujimoto and Okubo (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy, Springer, Berlin, 360-367.
  • Strykowski G (1998) Geoid and Mass density - how and why? In: Forsberg, Feissl and Deitrich (eds) Geodesy on the Move, Springer, Berlin, 237-242.
  • Strykowski G (1999) Silkeborg gravity high revisited: horizontal extension of the source and its uniqueness. Proc. XXIV General Assembly of the European Geophysical Society, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Strykowski G (1999) Some technical details concerning a new method of gravimetric-seismic inversion, Proc. XXIII General Assembly of the European Geophysical Society, Nice, France, 1998, Phys. Chem. Earth, 24, 207-214.
  • Strykowski G, Dahl OC (1998) The geoid as an equipotential surface in a sense of Newton's integral - ideas and examples, Proc. 2nd Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Budapest, Hungary, Report 98.4, Finnish Geodetic Institute, 113-116.
  • Sünkel H (1982) Point mass models and the anomalous gravitational field, Report 327, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Sünkel H (1982) Point mass models and the anomalous gravitational field, Report 327, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Sünkel H (1985) An isostatic earth model, Report 367, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Sünkel H (1986) Global topographic-isostatic models, in Mathematical and Numerical Techniques in Physical Geodesy, Sunkel H (ed), Springer, Berlin, Germany: 417-462.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

T T T

  • Tarantola A (1987) Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Teunissen PJT, Knickmeyer EH (1998) Nonlinearity and Least Squares. CISM Journal ACSGC, 42: 321-330.
  • Teunissen PJT (990) Nonlinear inversion of geodetic and geophysical data: diagnosing nonlinearity. In: F.K. Brunner and C. Rizos (ed.), Developments in Four-Dimensional Geodesy. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences Vol. 29. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • Timmen L, Wenzel H-G (1995) Worldwide synthetic gravity tide parameters, in Suenkel and Marson (eds) Gravity and Geoid, Springer, Berlin, 92-101.
  • Toth G (1996) Topographic-isostatic models fitting to the global gravity field, Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 31(3-4): 411-421.
  • Toth G (1998) Topographic isostatic models fitted to geopotential, Proc. Second Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, March 10 - 14, Budapest, Hungary:
  • Tscherning CC (1985) On the use and abuse of Molodensky?s mountain, In: Schwarz K-P, Lachapelle G (eds) Geodesy in Transition, University of Calgary, 133-147.
  • Tscherning CC (1987) Evaluation of local gravity field determination methods. Report of IAG SSG 3.90 for the period

    • 1983-1987, presented at the XIX General Assembly of the IUGG, Vancouver, 1987.
  • Tscherning CC, Suenkel H (1981) A method for the construction of spheroidal mass distributions consistent with the harmonic part of the Earth?s gravity potential, manuscripta geodaetica, 6: 131-156.
  • Tziavos IN (1996) Comparisons of spectral techniques for geoid computations over large regions, Journal of Geodesy, 70: 357-373.
  • Tziavos IN, Sideris MG, Suenkel H (1996) The effect of surface density variations terrain modelling - a case study in Austria. Report 96.2, Finnish Geodetic Institute, 99-110.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

U U U
 
 

V V V

  • Vajda P (1995) Truncated geoid and the gravimetric inverse problem, PhD thesis, Univesrity of New Brunswick.
  • Vajda P, Vanicek P (1997) On gravity inversion for point mass anomalies by means of the truncated geoid. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 41: 329-344.
  • Vajda P, Vanicek P (1998) A note on spectral filtering of the truncated geoid. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 28(4): 253-262.
  • Vajda P, Vanicek P (1998) On the numerical evaluation of the truncated geoid. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 28(1): 15-27.
  • Vajda P, Vanicek P (1999) The instant of the dimple onset for the high degree truncated geoid. submitted to Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy.
  • Vajda P, Vanicek P (1999) Truncated geoid and gravity inversion for one point-mass anomaly. Journal of Geodesy, 73: 58-66.
  • Vajk R (1956) Bouguer correction with varying surface density. Geophysics 21, 1004-.
  • Vanicek P, Christou N (eds) (1993) Geoid and its Geophysical Interpretations, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  • Vanicek P, Kleusberg A (1985) What an external gravitational potential can really tell us about mass distribution. Bolletino Geofisica Teoretica et Applicata, XXCII(108): 243-250.
  • Vermeer M (1982) The use of point mass models for describing the Finnish gravity field, Proc. Ninth Nordic Geodetic Commission, Sept. 13-17, Gävle, Sweden.
  • Vermeer M (1989) FGI studies on satellite gravity gradiometry. 1. Experiments with a 5-degree buried masses grid representation, Report 89:3, Finnish Geodetic Institute, Helsinki.
  • Vermeer M (1989) Global geopotential inversion from satellite gradiometry using mass point grid techniques. In: Sacerdote F, Sanso F (eds) Proc. II Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, June 5-8, Pisa, 325-368.
  • Vermeer M (1989) Modelling of gravity gradient tensor observations using buried shells of mass quadrupoles, In: Andersen OB (ed) Modern Techniques in Geodesy and Surveying, Kort-og Matrikelstyrelsen, Copenhagen, 461-478.
  • Vermeer M (1992) Geoid determination with mass point frequency domain inversion in the Mediterranean, Mare Nostrum 2, GEOMED report, Madrid, 109-119.
  • Vermeer M (1994) STEP inversion simulations by a spectral domain, buried masses method. In: Rummel R, Schwinzler P (eds) A major STEP for Geodesy. Report 1994, STEP Geodesy Working Group, 75-83.
  • Vermeer M (1995) Mass point geopotential modelling using fast spectral techniques; historical overview, toolbox description, numerical experiment, manuscripta geodaetica, 20: 362-378.
  • Vermeer M (1998) Regularization Constraints in Mass Point Grids and their Relation to gravity field stochastics, Phys. Chem. Earth, Vol. 23, No. 1, 13-18.
  • Vysokil V (1956) Determination of the shape of a boundary between two media from gravitational data for varying density with depth. Trav Inst Geophys Acad Tchecosl Sci 38.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

W W W

  • Wang Z (1998) Geoid and crustal structure in Fennoscandia. Report 126, Finnish Geodetic Insitute. PhD thesis, 118 pp.
  • Weightman JA (1965) Gravity, geodesy and artificial satellites, A unified analytical approach. Presented paper,

    • Symposium on the Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, Athens, 1965.
  • Werner RA (1997) Spherical harmonic coefficients for the potential of a constant-density polyhedron, Computers and Geosciences, 23(10): 1071-1077
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

X X X

  • Xia J, Sprowl DR (1991) Correction of topographic distortions in gravity data, Geophysics, 56: 537-541.
  • Xia J, Sprowl DR, Adkins-Heljeson (1993) Correction of topographic distortions in potential-field data: A fast and accurate approach, Geophysics, 58: 515-523.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

Y Y Y
 
 

Z Z Z

  • Zhang C, Blais JAR (1993) Recovery of gravity disturbances from satellite altimetry by FFT techniques: a synthetic study, manuscripta geodaetica, 18: 158-170.
Top on page Back to SSG3.177 homepage

 

This page is maintained by Professor Will Featherstone and Dr.-Ing. Michael Kuhn. It was last modified on the 19th of October, 2002.
It is mandatory to add a Curtin Disclaimer. CRICOS provider code: 00301J